Practical Spiritual Insights from Parshah
Chayei Sarah[1]
Bereishit Genesis (Genesis 23:1-25:18)
Sarah’s lifetime—the span of Sarah’s life—came to one hundred and
twenty-seven years. (23:1)
Paradoxically, the Torah section entitled Chayei Sarah (“The Life
of Sarah”) deals entirely with events that occurred after Sarah’s death.[2]
Why does the Torah split up the tally of her years into three
parts (“one hundred years,” “twenty years” and “seven years”)? To tell us that
every day of her life was the equivalent of them all. At the age of one hundred
years she was like age twenty in strength, and at age twenty she was like age
seven in modesty and purity; at age seven she was like age twenty in
intelligence, and at age twenty she was like age one hundred in righteousness …
(Midrash HaGadol)[3]
Sarah experienced many hardships and challenges, but they were not
her life, her focus. Her life's purpose was to fulfill her Divine
mission, and she remained consistent in her devotion to God throughout her
entire lifetime. In this respect, all the years of her life were equally
devoted to goodness.[4]
Sarah's life should serve as an inspiration for us all.
Sarah died in Kiriath-arba—now Hebron—in the land of Canaan; and
Abraham proceeded to mourn for Sarah and to bewail her. (23:2)
The rabbis say that hearing about Abraham's attempt to sacrifice
her son was too much for her. How was Abraham capable of nearly sacrificing his
son, whereas Sarah could not even bear hearing about such a possibility?
As we have seen,[5]
Abraham was somewhat detached from the world and viewed things from their
abstract, spiritual perspective. Sarah's focus, in contrast, was on integrating
Divine spirituality into the mundane world. So, while Abraham could somehow
detach himself from the fact that Isaac's death would spell the end of their
Divine mission, Sarah could not. The thought that Isaac was no longer alive
opposed everything she lived for, and her soul left her.[6]
Upon hearing that her husband and son had risen to the challenge
of this ultimate sacrifice, Sarah's soul was freed from the bonds of her body
and attained an infinitely higher level of connection with God. It was
specifically through this lofty experience that her life's mission was
completed and she no longer needed to remain in this world.[7]
A person's essential physical needs can be divided into two
categories: internal needs, such as air and food, and external needs, such as
clothing and shelter. Our spiritual needs—the Divine consciousness that
sustains us spiritually—may also be similarly categorized: the immanent aspects
of Divinity, which we can internalize and understand; and the transcendent
aspects of Divinity, which we can know about but not truly understand. When we
do our utmost to internalize what we can comprehend and then accept what we
cannot comprehend, God blesses our efforts with success beyond measure, just as
He blessed Sarah.
Yet, there is a third human need: light. Lighting up a dark room
adds nothing per se to the room, yet the entire ambience has been transformed.
Confusion, disorientation, and gloom are replaced by clarity, direction, and
joy. Similarly, we can perform our Divine mission impeccably but without light,
warmth, and vitality. This is a miracle: our ability to invigorate our work
with warmth, enthusiasm, and vitality.[8]
Then Abraham rose from beside his dead, and spoke to the Hittites,
saying, (23:3)
Here we see the great effect Sarah's life had upon her husband.
Abraham's courage to speak forcefully to the Hittites came from Sarah. Our
sages call the Jewish [or God-fearing Gentile] wife "the mainstay of the
home." Her positive influence is recognizable in the actions and behavior
of her husband and children.[9]
Although Abraham spoke with deference to the Hittites, at the same
time he was not willing to negotiate: he stated his position firmly. As we see
from the ensuing dialogue, the Hittites respected Abraham's seriousness and did
not question his right to the property. In fact, they offered to give him not
only the burial cave but the entire field.
Similarly, in all cases of fulfilling God's will, we should not
hesitate to articulate our position respectfully yet firmly, and make it clear
to any voices of opposition—whether originating within our own minds, within
our own ranks, or from without—that we will not hesitate to exercise our full
rights if need be. When we do not vacillate, not only is any potential
opposition nipped in the bud; the truth of our position even transforms
possible enemies into friends.[10]
and spoke to Ephron in the hearing of the people of the land,
saying, “If only you would hear me out! Let me pay the price of the land;
accept it from me, that I may bury my dead there.”
(23:13)
The Jew is a “resident” in the world, for the Torah instructs him
not escape the physical reality but to inhabit it and elevate it. Virtually all
the mitzvot (divine commandments) of the Torah are physical actions involving
physical objects, in keeping with the Jew’s mission to make a “dwelling for G-d
in the material realm” by sanctifying the everyday materials of everyday life.
At the same time, the Jew [and God-fearer] feels himself a
“stranger” in the material world. His true home is a higher, loftier place, the
world of spirit, the world of holiness and Godliness from which his soul has
been exiled and to which it yearns to return. Indeed, it is only because the
Jew [and God-fearing Gentile] feels himself a stranger in the world that he can
avoid being wholly consumed and overwhelmed by it, and maintain the spiritual
vision and integrity required to elevate it and sanctify it as an abode for the
divine presence… (The Lubavitcher Rebbe)
The story is told of the visitor who, stopping by the home of the
great Chassidic master Rabbi DovBer of Mezheritch, was outraged by the poverty he
encountered there. Rabbi DovBer’s home was bare of all furnishing, save for an
assortment of rough wooden planks and blocks that served as benches for his
students during the day and as beds for his family at night.
“How can you live like this?” demanded the visitor. “I myself am
far from wealthy, but at least in my home you will find, thank G-d, the basic
necessities: some chairs, a table, beds...”
“Indeed?” said Rabbi DovBer. “But I don’t see any of your
furnishings. How do you manage without them?”
“What do you mean? Do you think that I schlep all my possessions
along with me wherever I go? When I travel, I make do with what’s available.
But at home—a person’s home is a different matter altogether!”
“Ah, yes,” said Rabbi DovBer. “At home [referring to his true
spiritual home], it is a different matter altogether...” (Likkutei Dibburim)
Holy things cannot be acquired "for free," that is,
without proper effort.[11]
This is why Abraham chose to pay to transfer the property into the realm of
holiness, even though it was rightfully his in any case.
Similarly, each one of us has been assigned a portion of the world
that it is our responsibility to bring into the realm of holiness. We must do
this at "full price," with hard work and effort. Even those of us who
find it easy to study the Torah and observe the commandments must push
ourselves beyond the boundaries of our natural inclinations. Only in this way
can we achieve our purpose in the world.[12]
Abraham was now old, advanced in years, and the Lord had blessed
Abraham in all things. (24:1)
Because Abraham continued to be deeply affected by events, the
years took their toll and the effect became visible. In this context, the Torah
is telling us that "Abraham was old…because he continued to deeply
internalize his experiences." Here, we may take Abraham's attitude as an
object lesson in how not to behave. Of course, we should strive to
emulate his care to deeply internalize his experiences. But at the same time,
we should trust in God's protection and not take life's experiences so to heart
that they age us physically.[13]
According to the sages, the word "old" in certain cases
implies "wise,"[14]
and the idiom "to come with days" means "to have used all one's
days for performing God's commandments."[15]
The pursuit of wisdom is an act of personal growth and self-fulfillment. Performing
the commandments, on the other hand, refines and elevates the physical world.
In many cases, these two facets of fulfilling God's will seem to conflict. Each
competes for our time and attention, forcing us to choose one over the other.
Abraham, however, was able to synthesize the two seamlessly. He pursued and
achieved his inward and outward goals without compromising either, and did so
in such a way that each complemented the other.
Blending two opposites is no small feat, one that other righteous
individuals who lived before the Torah was given were not able to accomplish.
They invariably opted for the path of inner personal refinement and eschewed
the challenge of elevating the world.
With the giving of the Torah, however, the ability to blend these
two approaches was granted to every Jew [and God-fearing Gentile]. As will be
explained further on, the Torah reconciles the opposing aspects in spiritual
life; as such, now that the Torah has been given to us, we can follow Abraham's
example and pursue both the path of self-refinement and that of the adaptation
of the world, such that both pursuits complement and enhance each other.[16]
But how can the Torah consider all of Abraham's days
productive, when we know that he was raised as an idolater and only recognized
the existence of God at a certain point in his childhood?[17]
Are we to count the years in which Abraham served idols together with the years
in which he served God?
The answer is yes, because it was precisely Abraham's idol worship
that compelled him to actively seek the truth. As Maimonides writes:[18]
"He wondered, 'How can the world run without someone running it?' He continued
searching until he found the truth."
As we saw above concerning Sarah,[19]
the periods of preparation and education in our lives count as part of our
periods of accomplishment. With Abraham, we see how even inadvertent periods of
negative activity can be counted together with positive periods if we use them
as an impetus for positive action.[20]
The Divine energy we generate by performing God's commandments
spreads around us, encompassing us as a spiritual "garment" that
clothes us from head to toe. This garment becomes the interface between our
psyches and our surrounding environment, such that all our experiences and
interactions are filtered through this Divine aura. This is the mechanism by
which we attain, maintain, and enhance our Divine consciousness even while
living in the physical world. In the afterlife, these garments take on a new
role: they enable the soul to absorb the sublime Godly energies of the Garden
of Eden.[21]
However, we perform the commandments not merely for our own sake,
but also in order to refine and elevate the world around us. It is imperative
to perform commandments daily, for the spiritual makeup of every day is a
unique blend of the spiritual energies that define it.
True, time is also divided into hours, months, years, and so on,
and each of these units also possesses its own unique spiritual identity; but
the basic unit of time is the day, as is clear from the fact that the
successive stages in the creation of the world were delineated by this unit. It
is therefore important to observe commandments on a daily basis, since if that
opportunity is missed, it can never be recovered, i.e., that segment of time
will not have been sanctified.
The Zohar thus interprets the phrase that Abraham
"came with days" to mean that he fulfilled the commandments every day
of his life.[22]
And Abraham said to the senior servant of his household, who had
charge of all that he owned, “Put your hand under my thigh (24:2)
Making the world into God's home is thus the archetypal case of
partial admission. Abraham knew this, as well as the fact that the formation of
Isaac's future family would be a crucial step in the process of making the
physical world a home for God.[23]
Therefore, when charging Eliezer with the mission of finding Isaac a wife, he
knew it was necessary to imbue the entire enterprise with power and commitment
beyond normal mortal capacities. He therefore made Eliezer take on oath, even
though he entertained no doubts as to his servant's fidelity to his mission.[24]
and I will make you swear by the Lord, the God of heaven and the
God of the earth, that you will not take a wife for my son from the daughters
of the Canaanites among whom I dwell, (24:3)
Initially, people are prepared to accept the existence of an
abstract, remote "God of heaven"; the idea of an intimate, personal
"God of the earth," who may encroach upon their private lives, is
much more threatening. Therefore, when Abraham began spreading his message of
Divine morality, he had no choice but to base it upon the premise of the
existence of a "God of heaven." Nonetheless, he continued educating
his disciples until they were also ready to accept the existence of a "God
of the earth," who is present within all aspects of reality and is
concerned with our personal lives, as well.[25]
We can divide our pursuits between the "heavenly" and
"earthly," i.e., between what we do for spiritual purposes and what
we do for physical survival or pleasure. Our challenge is to ensure that God be
just as much the "God of the earth" as He is the "God of
heaven," i.e., that we be as conscious of Him when we engage in physical
pursuits as we are when we engage in spiritual pursuits.[26]
but will go to the land of my birth and get a wife for my son
Isaac.” (24:4)
The prophets often describe the relationship between God and the
Jewish people [and God-fearing Gentiles] as that of husband and wife.[27]
In this sense, we are all entrusted with a mission comparable to the one
Abraham gave Eliezer: to go out and find those souls that have drifted away and
bring them back to God, their "husband." And just as Abraham assured
Eliezer that his mission would be crowned with success, we too are assured that
our attempts to bring back the lost souls of Israel [and the nations] will also
be blessed with success.
True, God grants each individual free choice, so it would
therefore follow that our success is as much up to the individual whom we are
trying to influence as it is to our own efforts. But we are also taught that
when He wants, God plants good thoughts in people's minds, influencing them to
choose good. Therefore, if, like Eliezer, we are totally committed to our
mission and pray to God for assistance in its fulfillment,[28]
we are indeed assured that God will crown our sincere and tenacious efforts
with success.[29]
And if the woman does not consent to follow you, you shall then be
clear of this oath to me; but do not take my son back there.” (24:8)
As we have seen, Eliezer was a righteous man, being Abraham's
loyal servant and most prized disciple who helped him disseminate his
teachings. Nevertheless, Eliezer was descended from Canaan, whose offspring had
been cursed to be slaves. The essence of this curse was that Canaan's
descendants would forever lack the mentality of self-determination, always
feeling like victims of forces beyond their control, slaves of fate or
circumstance.
This attitude is diametrically opposed to the Torah's insistence
that humanity is free and unbound by any type of moral predetermination.
Someone who does not feel that he is free to act as he pleases—and therefore
responsible for his actions—cannot be part of the people whose Divine mission
is to bring the Torah's message of hope and moral freedom to humanity.
And more importantly, the insidious specter of victimization and
predetermination breeds depression; someone who considers himself a helpless
and hopeless victim cannot evince the joy in life that must serve as the basis
of our relationship to God.[30]
let the maiden to whom I say, ‘Please, lower your jar that I may
drink,’ and who replies, ‘Drink, and I will also water your camels’—let her be
the one whom You have decreed for Your servant Isaac. Thereby shall I know that
You have dealt graciously with my master.” (24:14)
It is axiomatic that God is perfect; since He lacks nothing, He
has no intrinsic need to receive anything from anyone. On the contrary, His
intrinsic self-sufficiency makes it natural for Him to bestow His beneficence
on His creation. Therefore, generosity is the primary way in which God relates
to the world, and generosity is the natural hallmark of people who feel closely
connected to God.
In contrast, evil has no intrinsic existence; it therefore has an
existential need to receive. No matter how much it possesses, this need to
receive remains unsatisfied, making it seek only to take and never to give.
Therefore, the hallmark of evil is selfishness.
Eliezer therefore sought a woman for Isaac who would display
kindness. When Rebecca went beyond fulfilling his specific request by offering
to also water his camels, he saw her expression of kindness as an indication
that she was a Godly person and thus a fitting match for the son of Abraham.[31]
He had scarcely finished speaking, when Rebekah, who was born to
Bethuel, the son of Milcah the wife of Abraham’s brother Nahor, came out with
her jar on her shoulder. (24:15)
When we do not receive the answers to our prayers immediately, it
is because we have overly "distanced" ourselves from God. God may
have in fact already answered our prayers, but because of our self-imposed
"distance" from Him, His answer may have to undergo a lengthy process
before reaching us. Those who have "distanced" themselves from God
less can receive the answers to their prayers more quickly, and those who have
so fully attuned their lives to God's will and presence that they have
eliminated all distance between themselves and Him can be answered immediately.
When two separate entities join, they can communicate instantaneously, but when
they fuse into one, their communication is intrinsic and need not even be
articulated.[32]
Likewise, the extent to which our prayers express our desire for
unity with God also affects how quickly we can receive God's answer to them.
Thus, the Torah relates three instances in which God answered a prayer
instantaneously:[33]
Eliezer's prayer to find a match for Isaac, Moses' prayer to be vindicated
before Korach's assembly,[34]
and Solomon's prayer that God rest His presence upon the Temple.[35]
The object of each of these prayers was the revelation of God's unity with
creation.[36]
Isaac and Rebecca's marriage brought together two opposite ends of
the spiritual spectrum: Isaac represented the height of spirituality
(especially inasmuch as he had been sanctified as an ascent-offering when he
was bound on the altar[37]),
while Rebecca (although herself totally righteous) came from a family of
idolaters and a place of hedonistic materialism. Similarly, the Torah and its
commandments enable us to redeem the spiritual potential latent within
materiality and to sanctify the physical world.
God's response to Eliezer came before he had even completed his
prayer, while His response to Moses and Solomon only came after they had
completed their prayers. Therefore, Solomon's and Moses' prayers that God
demonstrate how He unites with the world and humanity could at best be answered
immediately. In contrast, Eliezer's prayer that God manifest the power of the
Torah—by arranging the match between Isaac and Rebecca—was answered even before
it was fully articulated. In fact, the only reason God waited until Eliezer had
almost concluded his prayer before answering it was so that he could recognize
Rebecca by the criteria he had established in his request.[38]
Additionally, Eliezer's prayer gave voice to his realization that
he could not rely on his own capabilities to perform this mission. As soon as
he declared his self-effacement to God, he earned the privilege of witnessing
the miracles that God would perform for Abraham.[39]
To the extent that we emulate Eliezer's realization of his
dependence upon God and orient our prayers toward the revelation of God's unity
with the world, God's answers to our prayers can be immediate. As God Himself
promises,[40]
"Before they call I will answer, and while they are yet speaking I will
hear."[41]
Finally, it was in Abraham's merit that God answered Eliezer's
prayer before he finished it. We, too, as Abraham's [physical or spiritual] heirs,
can be assured that, no matter how dark the exile, God is prepared to respond
to our every need—even before it is fully verbalized.[42]
The man, meanwhile, stood gazing at her, silently wondering
whether the Lord had made his errand successful or not. (24:21)
When we are confronted with a startling new and deep insight, we
are initially awe-struck and disoriented; this breaks us out of our previous,
limited mindset. Only after our mental complacency has been thus eliminated can
we become absorbed and engrossed in the new insight.
These two stages are recognizable in the episode involving
Eliezer. Eliezer first "wondered about her." He was startled by the
Divinely-orchestrated flow of events and thereby lost his self-awareness. Once
this happened, he was able to become fully engrossed in the events and begin
"wanting to know" if this was indeed the woman he was seeking for
Isaac. Had he not relinquished his ego, allowing himself to be amazed at the
display of Divine providence, his personal interests and motives would have
interfered with his ability to interpret the events correctly—"to know whether
or not God had made his journey successful."[43]
When the camels had finished drinking, the man took a gold
nose-ring weighing a half-shekel, and two gold bands for her arms, ten shekels
in weight. (24:22)
The Torah here refers to the half-shekel by its weight, a beka,
without defining it as a half-shekel. In contrast, in its description of the
half-shekel that the Jewish people gave for the census, the Torah states,
"a beka per head, which is a half-shekel."[44]
Strangely, rather than defining it here, the first time it is used, the Torah
defines the term beka only toward the end of the Book of Exodus.
The reason for this is that the Torah is contrasting our
relationship with God before and after the Giving of the Torah. Our
relationship with God is like a marriage, in that God and the Jewish people [and
God-fearing Gentiles] are like two halves of a whole—each one is incomplete
without the other. Eliezer alluded to this interdependency by betrothing
Rebecca to Isaac with an object that weighed a half shekel.
Inasmuch as the Torah is what binds us to God [and Yeshua the
Messiah is what binds God-fearing Gentiles to Torah and to God], prior to the
Giving of the Torah, our union with God was akin to the attachment of two
discrete entities. After the Giving of the Torah, however, our union with God
became akin to the fusion of two halves into a whole.
This verse therefore uses the term beka alone, only
alluding to the concept of "halfness" (since the word beka
itself means "a split"), since the unity of God and the Jewish people
[and the God-fearing Gentiles] at that time only approximated the
relationship of two halves of a whole. In contrast, the verse describing the
census clearly defines a beka as a half-shekel, for after the Giving of
the Torah, we were able to unite with God as two halves of a whole.[45]
“I am Abraham’s servant,” he began. (24:34)
The Torah is generally sparing in its words. Why, then, is the
Torah so verbose in narrating Eliezer's search for Rebecca, first relating the
episode and then reporting Eliezer's recounting of the incident to Rebecca's
family in great detail?[46]
One answer: The Torah's laws are designed to enable us to
transcend nature, to overcome the world's natural un-receptiveness to Divine
consciousness. In essence, then, they transcend all natural boundaries,
including that of human intellect. They can therefore only be revealed to us
through allusion and exegesis. In contrast, the Torah's narratives (despite the
fact that many of them contain open miracles), occur fully within the context
of nature——and thus can be related explicitly.[47]
Another answer: the elaborate recounting of Eliezer's narrative
itself helps us to grasp the terse laws of the Torah, despite their infinite
nature: Eliezer, the servant of Abraham, exemplifies the values of selfless
commitment and devotion. By elaborating on Eliezer's narrative, the Torah
intends to imbue us with this selflessness, making it the foundation of our
spiritual lives. Once we have developed this selflessness, we are better able
to grasp the Torah's laws, unencumbered by preconceived notions and biases or
the finiteness of our nature.[48]
They called Rebekah and said to her, “Will you go with this man?”
And she said, “I will.” (24:58)
Rebecca's immediate and unequivocal consent to the proposed
marriage seems rash. This was the first she had heard about the match.[49]
It involved going off with a man she hardly knew to marry a man she had not yet
met, and it went against the wishes and advice of her family.[50]
The only way we can explain her reaction is if we assume that it
came directly from Divine inspiration and was, in essence, beyond her control.
God willed Rebecca to make this decision, in further fulfillment of Abraham's
promise to Eliezer that the angel of God would "go before"
him, to pre-arrange and expedite the entire process without hindrance.[51]
And they blessed Rebekah and said to her, “O sister! May you grow
Into thousands of myriads; May your offspring seize The gates of their foes.” (24:60)
This verse, too, reflects Eliezer's un-natural success. Not
only was Rebecca's family unable to prevent her marriage to Isaac, they
even gave it their blessings. Furthermore, they prayed that her descendants
should be victorious over their foes, and this would eventually include Laban
himself!
Again we learn that if we wholeheartedly commit ourselves, as
Eliezer did, to fulfilling our Divine mission, we, too, will see miraculous
success.[52]
And Isaac went out walking in the field toward evening and,
looking up, he saw camels approaching. (24:63)
The Sages say that Isaac went out to pray in the field towards
evening, for in addition to following his father's custom of praying at the
beginning of the day, he had initiated the practice of praying at the day's
end, as well. He looked up, and he saw camels approaching.
We recite the morning prayer before beginning our workday and the
evening prayer after completing our day's activities. In contrast, the
afternoon prayer requires us to stop in the midst of our mundane affairs and
focus on God.
Our daily, mundane affairs are symbolized by "the
field," the area outside the city limits, which is untamed and uncultivated.
Through instituting the afternoon prayer, Isaac transformed "the
field" into a place of prayer to God.
The morning prayer undeniably serves as our principal daily
renewal of Divine consciousness. Nonetheless, afterwards, it remains to be seen
how we will fare when we go out into "the field." Will the secular
and material influences of "the field" cause us to lose the spiritual
awareness and closeness to God that we achieved during the morning prayer? By
stopping in the middle of our mundane affairs in order to recite the afternoon
prayer, we demonstrate that our involvement in material affairs does not
separate us from God.[53]
Our lives are metaphorically divided into the stages of morning,
afternoon, and evening, i.e., childhood, adulthood, and retirement. During
childhood, we are sheltered from the responsibilities of "real" life
and can remain focused on God without too many distractions. Upon reaching
retirement age, we can once again disengage from worldly affairs and focus on
what is truly meaningful. The true challenge occurs in our middle years, when
we go out to "the field" and are fully engaged in earning a living
and raising our families. It is especially during this period in our lives that
we are called upon to raise our eyes upward, just as Isaac did, and focus on
our true purpose in life.[54]
Raising her eyes, Rebekah saw Isaac. She alighted from the camel (24:64)
This was one last manifestation of Abraham's promise that God
would ensure the success of Eliezer's entire mission. Even with his mission
completed, supernatural orchestration of events continued to ensure that there
would be no unnecessary delays. The very moment Rebecca and Eliezer arrived,
they "chanced" upon Isaac in the field.[55]
The servant told Isaac all the things that he had done. (24:66)
Eliezer cited the miracles God performed for him as proof that he
had fulfilled his mission devotedly, without any personal motives. Similarly,
when we approach our Divine mission with this underlying selflessness, we can
indeed be assured of complete success, even if many miracles are needed along
the way.[56]
Isaac then brought her into the tent of his mother Sarah, and he
took Rebekah as his wife. Isaac loved her, and thus found comfort after his
mother’s death. (24:67)
The Sages say that Isaac brought Rebecca into the tent,
placing his household's domestic affairs under her control. From the
moment she assumed this role, it became clear that Rebecca was exactly like his
mother Sarah, for the ongoing miracles that had occurred in Sarah's merit
when she was alive once again resumed: the oil lamp Rebecca lit on Friday
remained lit until the following Friday, even though it only held enough oil
for one day; even a small amount of the bread she baked sufficed to satisfy
hunger; and a cloud hovered above the tent. Seeing how she was blessed in these
ways, Isaac became fully convinced that Rebecca was indeed worthy of being his
mother Sarah's successor.
As long as Sarah lived, there was a blessing on her dough, and the
lamp used to burn from the evening of the Sabbath until the evening of the
following Sabbath; when she died, these ceased; but when Rebecca came, they returned…
(Midrash Rabbah; Rashi)
Jewish law dictates that if the woman of the home cannot light the
Sabbath candles for whatever reason, her husband must do so in her stead.[57]
Since, as we know, Abraham observed all the commandments (even the rabbinic
ordinances),[58]
he lit the Sabbath candles after Sarah's passing. Yet, despite his great
righteousness, his candles did not remain lit throughout the week, as Sarah's
had.
This demonstrates the unique ability of Jewish [and God-fearing
Gentile] women and girls—who are all "daughters" of Sarah and
Rebecca—to influence the spiritual character of the home, illuminating it with
the holiness of the Sabbath throughout the ensuing mundane week. Although the
illumination provided by their candles might be physically visible for only a
limited time, their spiritual illumination remains the entire week.
By nature, the male is the gatherer: he brings the provisions, the
raw materials, into the home. But it is the woman who refines them and prepares
them for human consumption, transforming all the man gathers into a viable,
livable home. This is true both materially and spiritually: only the woman
possesses the spiritual power to make the home fit to be a home for God, as
well. Therefore, Abraham's candles could produce no more than a natural,
limited light; he was not truly able to spiritualize the house.
It is instructive to note that this and the other miracles
returned even before Rebecca married Isaac.[59]
Thus, we can view Rebecca's lighting of the Sabbath candles as a precedent for
the custom to have young unmarried girls … light Sabbath candles each
Friday, in addition to those lit by their mother.[60]
Considering the extent of today's spiritual darkness, it would
seem wise for all Jewish [and God-fearing Gentile] communities (even those who,
in the past, did not follow this custom) to encourage all girls from the age of
three, who can understand the concept of Sabbath candles, to adopt this custom.
This will bring much-needed spiritual light, both to their own home and
ultimately to the entire world.[61]
Abraham took another wife, whose name was Keturah. (25:1)
This is Hagar. She is called Keturah because her deeds were now as
pleasing as the ketoret (the incense offered in the Holy Temple)… (Midrash
Rabbah; Rashi)
Literally, these words mean "Abraham enhanced," alluding
to the fact that it was only after Abraham enhanced the quality of his own
Divine service that he was able to spiritually elevate Hagar [whom the sages
assert is Keturah]. We must first elevate ourselves in order to elevate someone
else.[62]
After the death of Abraham, God blessed his son Isaac. And Isaac
settled near Beer-lahai-roi. (25:11)
Abraham embodied loving-kindness, while Isaac embodied strength
and severity. Abraham therefore sought to reveal the good within other people
by focusing on their positive behavior. With Esau, this was clearly impossible,
for whatever good he possessed was too buried beneath the effects of years of
sinful living. Only the overwhelming power of Isaac's approach could possibly
connect Esau with the limitless energy of repentance.[63]
LIFE AFTER DEATH
The events recounted in the Torah section of Chayei Sarah (Genesis
23:1-25:18) all take place after Sarah’s death. Not only that—they seem to all underscore
the fact of her demise. First we read of Sarah’s burial in the Machpeilah Cave
in Hebron. Following that, we have the story of Rebecca’s selection as a wife
for Isaac and how she came to replace Sarah as the matriarch in Abraham’s
household. And then the Torah tells of the return of Hagar—whom Sarah had
banished from Abraham’s home.
Yet Chayei Sarah means “the life of Sarah”! How is this to
be reconciled with the concept that the name of a Torah portion expresses its
essential theme and message?
While includes heaven and hell … its central feature is techiat
hameitim, the vivification of the dead. Techiat hameitim states that
in the messianic age our souls will be restored to our resurrected bodies. In
other words, life as our own soul inhabiting our own body—basically the life we
know today—will resume.
But the sages of the Talmud go even further than that, stating
that there is a level on which life extends beyond death without interruption.
“Moses did not die,” they categorically state; “Our father Jacob did not die,”
despite the fact that “the eulogizers eulogized, the embalmers embalmed, and
the gravediggers buried.” Lest one interpret these statements allegorically, Rashi
(Rabbi Shlomo Yitzchaki, 1040- 1105, the greatest of the biblical and talmudic
commentators) explains, “He seemed to them as if dead, but in truth he was
alive.”
Chassidic master Rabbi Schneur Zalman of Liadi explains that life
as we know it can indeed survive death; the question is only what sort of life
is it that we know before death.
Life’s pleasures are many and varied, but they can be divided into
two general categories: the satisfaction of a personal need or desire, or the
achievement of a certain impact on the lives of others. The first category
offers many gratifying moments; but nothing can equal the fulfillment that
comes when you make a difference in others’ lives, when the world becomes
different—better, smarter, holier—because of something you’ve done.
The first category ceases with the interruption of physical life.
Once you’re dead and buried, there are no more strolls in the park. But your
impact on the world continues. If you taught something to someone, that person
is now teaching it to someone else. If you acted kindly to someone, that person
still feels good about it, is a better person for it, and is acting more kindly
to others. If you made the world a better place, that improvement is now being
built upon to make the world an even better place.
So does “life as we know it” extend beyond death? That depends on
what you know life as. If life, to you, is getting the most you can of its
resources for yourself, you have a limited time in which to get as much as you
can, and then the fat lady sings and the curtain falls. If life, to you, is
making a difference in the lives of others, you’re going to live forever.
This is the message of the Torah reading of Chayei Sarah,
in which “The Life of Sarah” occurs after her death. Ostensibly, the
events of Chayei Sarah emphasize that fact that Sarah is no more; in
truth, however, they proclaim that Sarah lives.
Together with Abraham, Sarah pioneered the Jewish settlement of
the Land of Canaan; as described in the opening chapter of Chayei Sarah,
her burial in the Cave of Machpeilah achieved the first actual Jewish ownership
of a piece of land in the Holy Land. Sarah devoted her life to the creation of the
first Jewish family; the story of Rebecca’s selection demonstrates how Sarah’s
successor embodied the ideals upon which Sarah founded the Jewish home.
Thus the name Chayei Sarah expresses this Torah section’s
true import. Indeed, none of the earlier Torah sections that relate the events
of Sarah’s life before her death can merit the name “The Life of Sarah.” These
describe what, taken on its own, can be seen as a temporal life—a life with a
beginning and an end, a life confined to a particular body and a particular
span of time. The true Chayei Sarah comes to light in the events
following her death, when the eternity of her life is revealed.
Based on the teachings of the Lubavitcher
Rebbe, www.therebbe.org; adapted by Yanki Tauber,
editor@chabadonline.com.
[1]This
Parshat is based on the Kehot Chumash, produced by Chabad of California with an
interpolated translation and commentary based on the works of the Lubavitcher
Rebbe, Rabbi Menachem Mendel Schneerson, of righteous memory. Copyright (c)
2008 by Chabad of California, Inc. All rights reserved.
[2] Parshah
Summary and Commentary: Chayei Sarah, www.Chabad.org, , 2003, p. 11.
[4] Likutei
Sichot, vol. 35, pp. 92-93.
[6] Hitva'aduyot
5748, vol. 1, pp. 475-478.
[7] Likutei
Sichot, vol. 20, pp. 329-330.
[8] Sichot
Kodesh 5720, pp. 102-104.
[9] Sichot
Kodesh 5735, pp. 156-158.
[10] Igrot
Kodesh, vol. 26, pp. 24-25.
[12] Likutei
Sichot, vol. 10, p. 64.
[13] Hitva'aduyot
5748, vol. 1, pp. 488-491; Likutei Sichot, vol. 35, pp. 89-92.
[14] Kidushin
32b; Sifra, Kedoshim 7; Midrash Zuta Rut 4; Seder Olam
Rabbah 30.
[16] Likutei
Sichot, vol. 3, pp. 773-779.
[17] See
Gen. 11:28, and 12:4.
[18] Mishneh
Torah, Avodah Zarah 1:3.
[20] Likutei
Sichot, vol. 35, pp. 68-69.
[21] Sefer
HaMa'amarim 5670, p. 164; Sefer HaMa'amarim 5707, p. 198.
[22] Likutei
Sichot, vol. 4, p. 1194.
[23] Sefer
HaSichot 5749, vol. 1, pp. 58-60; Likutei Sichot, vol. 20,
pp. 95 ff.
[24] Sefer
HaSichot 5749, vol. 1, p. 63, note 54.
[25] Hitva'aduyot
5743, vol. 4, p. 1987.
[26] Sichot
Kodesh 5739, vol. 1, pp. 243-250.
[27] E.g.,
Jeremiah 2:2, Isaiah 50:1, Hosea 1-3, and the Song of Songs.
[29] Likutei
Sichot, vol. 25, pp. 104-105.
[30] Sichot
Kodesh 5740, vol. 1, pp. 740-741.
[31] Sidur
im Dach 92b. See also on 36:12 below.
[32] Midrash
HaGadol on this verse; Mishneh Torah, Teshuvah 7:7.
[33] Bereishit
Rabbah 60:4; Yalkut Shimoni, Chayei Sarah 108.
[36] Tanya,
chapter 4, citing Zohar. See Zohar 1:24a.
[38] Likutei
Sichot, vol. 25, p. 100.
[39] Likutei
Sichot, vol. 25, p. 104.
[41] Sichot
Kodesh 5732, vol. 1, p. 160.
[42] Hitva'aduyot
5742, vol. 1, pp. 403-405.
[43] Sefer
HaMa'amarim 5714, pp. 168-9.
[45] Likutei
Sichot, vol. 3, p. 929-930 and note 31, with my adaptations in [ ].
[46] See
Rashi on verse 42.
[47] Likutei
Sichot, vol. 30, pp. 94-95.
[48] Likutei
Sichot, vol. 1, p. 37.
[49] See Likutei
Sichot, vol. 25, p. 101, note 23.
[50] See Hadrat
Zekeinim.
[51] Likutei
Sichot, vol. 25, p. 101, and note 26.
[52] Hitva'aduyot
5742, vol. 1, p. 438.
[53] Sichot
Kodesh 5715, p. 260. Hayom Yom 22 Adar I; Igrot Kodesh, vol. 4, pp.
182-183.
[54] Igrot
Kodesh (Rayatz), vol. 4, p. 3.
[55] Likutei
Sichot, vol. 25, p. 101; Hitva'aduyot 5742, vol. 1, p. 438.
[56] Hitva'aduyot
5746, vol. 1, p. 627.
[57] Shulchan
Aruch HaRav, Orach Chaim, 263:5, 9, and 11.
[59] Levush
on this verse. Cf. Chizkuni above on verse 10.
[60] Likutei
Sichot, vol. 15, pp. 168-172.
[61] Likutei
Sichot, vol. 11, pp. 283-284, vol. 15, p. 173.
[62] See Likutei
Sichot, vol. 15, p. 179.
[63] Likutei
Sichot, vol. 10, pp. 84-85.